Dropping quarterly company reports in US may not be a bad thing
Summary
The piece argues that reducing or dropping quarterly reporting could improve corporate decision-making if regulators preserve timely disclosure of material information. It says the worst outcome would be loosening reporting without strengthening rules that prevent selective disclosure and information gaps.
Why it matters
Quarterly reporting rules shape market transparency and corporate incentives, so changing them can reprice risk across US equities and alter how companies allocate capital.